<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hybrid Eclipse View</title>
	<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Wolverine</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-479</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-479</guid>
					<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-471"&gt;Solar Flare&lt;/a&gt;:

I've never looked through a CaK scope, so I'm not sure if you have to similarly "train your eyes" (so to speak) for observing like Hydrogen alpha. One thing it's handy for though is being able to see things developing closer to the surface. I guess it'd be somewhat of a luxury -- I'm really after one of the SolarMax scopes, not only for observing but solar imaging (something I'd &lt;em&gt;love&lt;/em&gt; to do on a regular basis, and log sunspots &#038; prominences).

I think the closest observatory to me is down at the University of Texas (the name escapes me); I've never tried going down there just because the public has really limited access to it, and it's right in the heart of downtown -- my backyard has much better conditions despite my lesser aperture.

As for the site design: I would like to do a major overhaul at some point; the snippet you saw of a modified &lt;a title="Chaotic Soul" target="_blank" href="http://sandbox.avalonstar.com/"&gt;theme&lt;/a&gt; last night looks a lot cleaner and less template-ish than this modified Kubrick-style WordPress theme that everyone and their brother runs. I'd have to do some major modifications to that one in order to get it to do what I want.

For now, I settled for tweaking a few things around and doing a font revision. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-471">Solar Flare</a>:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never looked through a CaK scope, so I&#8217;m not sure if you have to similarly &#8220;train your eyes&#8221; (so to speak) for observing like Hydrogen alpha. One thing it&#8217;s handy for though is being able to see things developing closer to the surface. I guess it&#8217;d be somewhat of a luxury &#8212; I&#8217;m really after one of the SolarMax scopes, not only for observing but solar imaging (something I&#8217;d <em>love</em> to do on a regular basis, and log sunspots &#038; prominences).</p>
<p>I think the closest observatory to me is down at the University of Texas (the name escapes me); I&#8217;ve never tried going down there just because the public has really limited access to it, and it&#8217;s right in the heart of downtown &#8212; my backyard has much better conditions despite my lesser aperture.</p>
<p>As for the site design: I would like to do a major overhaul at some point; the snippet you saw of a modified <a title="Chaotic Soul" target="_blank" href="http://sandbox.avalonstar.com/">theme</a> last night looks a lot cleaner and less template-ish than this modified Kubrick-style WordPress theme that everyone and their brother runs. I&#8217;d have to do some major modifications to that one in order to get it to do what I want.</p>
<p>For now, I settled for tweaking a few things around and doing a font revision. <img src='http://www.wolverinesden.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wolverine</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-478</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 23:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-478</guid>
					<description>Heh, sorry AitchJay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, sorry AitchJay.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AitchJay</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-477</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 23:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-477</guid>
					<description>damn, wolverine beat me to it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn, wolverine beat me to it..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AitchJay</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-476</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 23:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-476</guid>
					<description>sunil, 
there are two images laid on top of each other. 
The outside one is of the solar eclipse, so the black circle is the moon eclipsing the sun. 
Inside the circle of the moon, they have placed a picture of the sun from space, to show the comparison of the corona.
I hope that clears it up.
It's an amazing image, very cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sunil,<br />
there are two images laid on top of each other.<br />
The outside one is of the solar eclipse, so the black circle is the moon eclipsing the sun.<br />
Inside the circle of the moon, they have placed a picture of the sun from space, to show the comparison of the corona.<br />
I hope that clears it up.<br />
It&#8217;s an amazing image, very cool.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wolverine</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-475</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 23:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-475</guid>
					<description>Sunil, the black &#038; white area around the Sun in the composite image is taken from a photo of the Sun's corona as seen from Earth, when the eclipse was in totality -- and just like we'd be able to see with our eyes. What they've done in the photo is add that to pictures of the solar disk itself taken in an ultraviolet wavelength (which isn't visible to the naked eye) as well as the solar emissions (in the reddish, exterior part of the frame) from the time of the eclipse. It's a really neat composite -- you can trace the lines extending from the Sun out to millions of miles (remember that the Sun is about 1,400,000 km in diameter, so that outer portion from the LASCO C2 instrument extends a long ways). It's not &lt;em&gt;quite&lt;/em&gt; all to scale, but it sure looks neat. :)

&lt;a title="Eclipse photo" target="_blank" href="http://www.spaceweather.com/eclipses/29mar06c/king1.jpg"&gt;This image&lt;/a&gt; taken (from southern Turkey) by Nick King is the best I've seen from the event. That might help add some perspective. You can view many more beautiful photos at the &lt;a target="_blank" title="March 29 Eclipse Gallery" href="http://www.spaceweather.com/eclipses/gallery_29mar06.htm"&gt;SpaceWeather gallery&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunil, the black &#038; white area around the Sun in the composite image is taken from a photo of the Sun&#8217;s corona as seen from Earth, when the eclipse was in totality &#8212; and just like we&#8217;d be able to see with our eyes. What they&#8217;ve done in the photo is add that to pictures of the solar disk itself taken in an ultraviolet wavelength (which isn&#8217;t visible to the naked eye) as well as the solar emissions (in the reddish, exterior part of the frame) from the time of the eclipse. It&#8217;s a really neat composite &#8212; you can trace the lines extending from the Sun out to millions of miles (remember that the Sun is about 1,400,000 km in diameter, so that outer portion from the LASCO C2 instrument extends a long ways). It&#8217;s not <em>quite</em> all to scale, but it sure looks neat. <img src='http://www.wolverinesden.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a title="Eclipse photo" target="_blank" href="http://www.spaceweather.com/eclipses/29mar06c/king1.jpg">This image</a> taken (from southern Turkey) by Nick King is the best I&#8217;ve seen from the event. That might help add some perspective. You can view many more beautiful photos at the <a target="_blank" title="March 29 Eclipse Gallery" href="http://www.spaceweather.com/eclipses/gallery_29mar06.htm">SpaceWeather gallery</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sunil</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-473</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 13:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-473</guid>
					<description>really never seen before such a image, but I have question that why the black oval is larger than the sun? this is interesting image taken, really awesome.

sunil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really never seen before such a image, but I have question that why the black oval is larger than the sun? this is interesting image taken, really awesome.</p>
<p>sunil
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Solar Flare</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-471</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 10:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/03/31/hybrid-eclipse-view/#comment-471</guid>
					<description>Ya, but the Cak says it's more for astrophotography, which is not my primary concern. I read all the info on their site, and it seems the PST would be fine for me. I'm holding out for a digicam, because I think my brother-in-law will give me his for my birthday, and it has video and all--it wasn't a cheap camera. He's so into the newest gadgets. (The GPS in the car annoyed me though.)

I would like a decent, not-so-expensive telescope for our Florida home. It's only 12 minutes to the beach and last summer there were some great nights. I don't need one here, but I would definitely use it there, and I can't cart it back and forth on the plane. There's some radio station where a guy from some school gives astro reports of what's in the sky that night. I stumbled upon it one night driving along. That's cool...as you're driving around he's telling you what to look for. I'm bummed though, I just found out that they put down the convertible. Argh. It's nice seeing moon halos as one is whizzing along the dark parts of A1A. I have some interesting memories in that car...Southhampton at night on the beach...LOTS of stars...oh well. 

I have messy notes about other people's telescopes I looked through--I have "90mm refractor Meade DS" scribbled down, which I liked the best--at least of what I looked at. Weird, I did a search and came across one of my posts from last year, lol. Ok...no need to worry about the messy notes. I wasted five months this year. :-(

Is there an observatory anywhere close to you? I've never been to McDonald, which is pretty pathetic. 

(I need to quit coffee--it isn't helping insomnia, lol) 

Are you going to change the design of this page? I really like it the way it is (except for the little red dots ;-))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, but the Cak says it&#8217;s more for astrophotography, which is not my primary concern. I read all the info on their site, and it seems the PST would be fine for me. I&#8217;m holding out for a digicam, because I think my brother-in-law will give me his for my birthday, and it has video and all&#8211;it wasn&#8217;t a cheap camera. He&#8217;s so into the newest gadgets. (The GPS in the car annoyed me though.)</p>
<p>I would like a decent, not-so-expensive telescope for our Florida home. It&#8217;s only 12 minutes to the beach and last summer there were some great nights. I don&#8217;t need one here, but I would definitely use it there, and I can&#8217;t cart it back and forth on the plane. There&#8217;s some radio station where a guy from some school gives astro reports of what&#8217;s in the sky that night. I stumbled upon it one night driving along. That&#8217;s cool&#8230;as you&#8217;re driving around he&#8217;s telling you what to look for. I&#8217;m bummed though, I just found out that they put down the convertible. Argh. It&#8217;s nice seeing moon halos as one is whizzing along the dark parts of A1A. I have some interesting memories in that car&#8230;Southhampton at night on the beach&#8230;LOTS of stars&#8230;oh well. </p>
<p>I have messy notes about other people&#8217;s telescopes I looked through&#8211;I have &#8220;90mm refractor Meade DS&#8221; scribbled down, which I liked the best&#8211;at least of what I looked at. Weird, I did a search and came across one of my posts from last year, lol. Ok&#8230;no need to worry about the messy notes. I wasted five months this year. <img src='http://www.wolverinesden.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Is there an observatory anywhere close to you? I&#8217;ve never been to McDonald, which is pretty pathetic. </p>
<p>(I need to quit coffee&#8211;it isn&#8217;t helping insomnia, lol) </p>
<p>Are you going to change the design of this page? I really like it the way it is (except for the little red dots <img src='http://www.wolverinesden.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
