<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Planetary Proposal</title>
	<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Wolverine</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1549</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1549</guid>
					<description>Ahha, just what I've been looking for -- Neil Tyson has weighed in on the latest episode of &lt;a href="http://www.pointofinquiry.org/?p=63" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Point of Inquiry&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahha, just what I&#8217;ve been looking for &#8212; Neil Tyson has weighed in on the latest episode of <a href="http://www.pointofinquiry.org/?p=63" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Point of Inquiry</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: You Name It at Wolverine&#8217;s Den</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1548</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1548</guid>
					<description>[...] After reading through the details, I rather prefer this to the original draft proposal unveiled last week. I suspect it still has problems, but perhaps fewer complications. I&#8217;m only confident of two things here, though: 1) all bets are off come this Thursday when the final vote takes place; 2) I&#8217;m really glad it&#8217;s not my job to determine what is or is not a planet. While it&#8217;s all too easy to snipe from the comfort of my monitors&#8217; glow, hammering out these ground rules is no simple task. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] After reading through the details, I rather prefer this to the original draft proposal unveiled last week. I suspect it still has problems, but perhaps fewer complications. I&#8217;m only confident of two things here, though: 1) all bets are off come this Thursday when the final vote takes place; 2) I&#8217;m really glad it&#8217;s not my job to determine what is or is not a planet. While it&#8217;s all too easy to snipe from the comfort of my monitors&#8217; glow, hammering out these ground rules is no simple task. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Reality Czech? at Wolverine&#8217;s Den</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1543</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 07:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1543</guid>
					<description>[...] It appears that the festivities are getting rather interesting in Prague as astronomers attending the IAU&#8217;s XXVIth General Assembly continue trying to hammer out what exactly constitutes a planet. (See my previous entry for more details.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It appears that the festivities are getting rather interesting in Prague as astronomers attending the IAU&#8217;s XXVIth General Assembly continue trying to hammer out what exactly constitutes a planet. (See my previous entry for more details.) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wolverine</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1542</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1542</guid>
					<description>The IDers already have enough of a propensity for manufacturing their own. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IDers already have enough of a propensity for manufacturing their own. <img src='http://www.wolverinesden.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Attis...</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1541</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1541</guid>
					<description>Yet again, some astronomers go into the realms of pseudo-science to make ammo for the real pseudo-scientists of the ID movement. o_O

-- Bridget</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet again, some astronomers go into the realms of pseudo-science to make ammo for the real pseudo-scientists of the ID movement. o_O</p>
<p>&#8211; Bridget
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wolverine</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1540</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1540</guid>
					<description>I've been hoping to see Neil Tyson comment on the IAU proposal. Come to find out (courtesy of the BA Blog) he appeared yesterday on &lt;em&gt;The Colbert Report&lt;/em&gt; -- which yielded &lt;a target="_blank" title="The Colbert Report" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-7l2G2a6js" rel="nofollow"&gt;this comedic exchange&lt;/a&gt;.

Great stuff. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been hoping to see Neil Tyson comment on the IAU proposal. Come to find out (courtesy of the BA Blog) he appeared yesterday on <em>The Colbert Report</em> &#8212; which yielded <a target="_blank" title="The Colbert Report" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-7l2G2a6js" rel="nofollow">this comedic exchange</a>.</p>
<p>Great stuff. <img src='http://www.wolverinesden.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sunil deshpande</title>
		<link>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1539</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wolverinesden.org/2006/08/17/planetary-proposal/#comment-1539</guid>
					<description>thanks wolverine, there was a head news on the today's star tv news chanel about this news, in which there are contradictions among astronomy scientist about pluto whether it is call as planet or not, and the 3 another planets going to meet the figure of 12( 9+3), but mostly the astrologers are predicting their profession by the assistance of 9 planets still today, what they are doing with 12 planets it will understand later. 

:)

Its a nice topic and was too hot on today. 

Regards

Sunil Deshpande</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks wolverine, there was a head news on the today&#8217;s star tv news chanel about this news, in which there are contradictions among astronomy scientist about pluto whether it is call as planet or not, and the 3 another planets going to meet the figure of 12( 9+3), but mostly the astrologers are predicting their profession by the assistance of 9 planets still today, what they are doing with 12 planets it will understand later. </p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>Its a nice topic and was too hot on today. </p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Sunil Deshpande
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
