You Name It

22Aug06

Planet candidates in the Solar System

This artist’s impression displays a dozen candidate planets currently listed on the International Astronomical Union’s watchlist next to the Earth for scale. The number of planets in our solar system could increase significantly in coming years. Or not. First, the IAU must determine what a planet actually is. Credit: The IAU / Martin Kornmesser

Here’s the latest from Prague, where Sky & Telescope’s Richard Fienberg reports on the ongoing debate between astronomers seeking to pin down what defines a planet:

The key provision of the twice-revised definition reads as follows: “A planet is a celestial body that (a) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid-body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic-equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (b) is the dominant object in its local population zone, and (c) is in orbit around the Sun.” (For now astronomers are trying to define what “planet” means only in our own solar system, avoiding the complication of planets around other stars or, worse, floating in free space.)

Whereas last week’s wording proposed a class of Pluto-like planets called “plutons” in highly elongated, tilted, 200-plus-year orbits, the new wording instead defines a class of hyphenated “dwarf-planets” that meet criteria (a) and (c) above, but not (b). This class includes Pluto, the slightly larger object provisionally known as 2003 UB313, and probably several other icy bodies in the Kuiper Belt beyond Neptune. It also includes Ceres, the biggest of the rocky asteroids circling the Sun between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter.

After reading through the details, I rather prefer this to the original draft proposal unveiled last week. I suspect it still has problems, but perhaps fewer complications. I’m only confident of two things here, though: 1) all bets are off come this Thursday when the final vote takes place; 2) I’m really glad it’s not my job to determine what is or is not a planet. While it’s all too easy to snipe from the comfort of my monitor’s glow, hammering out these ground rules is no simple task.

Added Aug 23: Video is available of yesterday’s proceedings, illustrating the revisions underway to the IAU’s initial draft of their planetary guidelines. Click the play icon to watch in Windows media format. [Running time: 1:03:02]

Watch stream

Further reading:

Planetary Definition Showdown! - Space.com
What’s in a name? - Jim Bell, guest commentator at The Planetary Society weblog
Time to Make a Decision - Robert Naeye, Sky & Telescope

Share or save this entry:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • TailRank
  • YahooMyWeb

3 Responses to “You Name It”  

  1. 1 Wolverine

    Dennis Overbye writes in today’s New York Times:

    The bottom line, said the Harvard astronomer Owen Gingerich, chairman of the Planet Definition Committee of the union, is that in the new definition, “Pluto is not a planet.”

    Dr. Gingerich cautioned that there were still many things to be sorted out. For example, the I.A.U. may or may not create a special name for Pluto and other dwarf planets, like Xena and others yet to be discovered, that dwell beyond Neptune. If so, he said that “plutonians” seemed a likelier choice than the previous suggestion “plutons.” That term was protested by geologists, who pointed out that it was already used in earth science for nuggets of molten rock that have solidified and reached the surface.

    With two more days before the scheduled vote, there was no guarantee that Pluto would not make a comeback and that the definition of planethood might be rewritten again.

    I’ll be curious to see what other tweaks are made by the end of the day. This article must have been written yesterday and posted this morning, since the much-awaited vote takes place tomorrow.

  2. 2 Reacher

    I’m just waiting for news reporters to start pronouncing Quaoar.

    Long time no speak. We’ll have to catch up soon.

    -Reacher.

  3. 3 Wolverine

    Heya Reacher, glad to see you stopped by. I’ll drop you an e-mail as soon as I can. :)

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

Quicktags:



rss

RSS 2.0 feed for entries. entries

RSS 2.0 feed for comments. comments

faves

Bad Astronomy Universe Today RichardDawkins.net James Randi Educational Foundation National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Planetary Society Planetary Photojournal HubbleSite SkyTonight The Skeptic's Dictionary Committee for Skeptical Inquiry Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter The Skeptics Society Earth and Sky Cassini-Huygens Point of Inquiry Spaceweather Mars Exploration Rovers Solar and Heliospheric Observatory KUT 90.5 FM, Austin Texas